English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Physics-guided symbolic neural network reveals optimal functional forms describing ground motions

Authors

Liu,  Xianwei
External Organizations;

Chen,  Su
External Organizations;

Fu,  Lei
External Organizations;

Li,  Xiaojun
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/fcotton

Cotton,  Fabrice
2.6 Seismic Hazard and Risk Dynamics, 2.0 Geophysics, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

5029350.pdf
(Postprint), 4MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Liu, X., Chen, S., Fu, L., Li, X., Cotton, F. (2025): Physics-guided symbolic neural network reveals optimal functional forms describing ground motions. - Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 188, Part A, 109100.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109100


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz.de/pubman/item/item_5029350
Abstract
This study presents a novel framework for ground motion modelling utilizing Physics-Guided Symbolic Neural Networks (PGSNN). Symbolic neural networks offer a new method for knowledge discovery, providing a unique perspective for automatically uncovering predictive functional forms from data. This approach differs from traditional methods as it does not rely on predefined equations. Instead, it employs symbolic operators to freely combine input parameters in a high-dimensional space. This method addresses the problem of data imbalance by incorporating physical guidance to ensure that the model produces results that are consistent with established physical principles. The resulting equations align with the expectations of the engineering seismology community, particularly within the magnitude-distance ranges, where classical equations are well calibrated. The prediction performance of the PGSNN, evaluated across different intensity measures (PGA, PGV, and PSA), was assessed by calculating the residuals between measured and predicted values and their standard deviations. The predictive capability of this model was verified using new event records. The results indicate that the prediction performance of the PGSNN is comparable to those of traditional methods.