English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Conference Paper

Validation of GNSS-based Integrated Water Vapor for the Swabian MOSES 2023 field campaign

Authors
/persons/resource/zusflo

Zus,  Florian
1.1 Space Geodetic Techniques, 1.0 Geodesy, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Oertel,  A.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/rohith

Thundathil,  Rohith       
0 Pre-GFZ, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

/persons/resource/dick

Dick,  G.
1.1 Space Geodetic Techniques, 1.0 Geodesy, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Knippertz,  P.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/wickert

Wickert,  J.
1.1 Space Geodetic Techniques, 1.0 Geodesy, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Zus, F., Oertel, A., Thundathil, R., Dick, G., Knippertz, P., Wickert, J. (2024): Validation of GNSS-based Integrated Water Vapor for the Swabian MOSES 2023 field campaign - Abstracts, EGU General Assembly 2024 (Vienna, Austria and Online 2024).
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-8792


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz.de/pubman/item/item_5027514
Abstract
The Swabian MOSES (Modular Observation Solutions for Earth Systems) field campaign was conducted between June and September 2023 in the southeastern Black Forest, the Neckar Valley and the Swabian Alb in southwestern Germany. It focused on hydro-meteorological extreme events, including the initiation and intensification of convective events which are accompanied by heavy rain and can lead to local flooding. As a part of the observing system the GFZ installed eight additional GNSS stations in the region of interest and operated them in near real time during the measurement campaign. The precise point positioning technique was utilized to provide Integrated Water Vapor (IWV) estimates with a temporal resolution of 15 min. In this contribution we provide a first comparison of these IWV estimates with those derived from atmospheric (re-) analysis datasets. We utilize the atmospheric reanalysis ERA5 (horizontal resolution 31 km) and the operational analysis ICON-D2 (horizontal resolution 2 km) provided by the German Weather Service. Ground-based GNSS data are not assimilated into ERA5 and ICON-D2. In general, we find good agreement between GNSS and (re-)analysis estimates: the root mean square error is 1-2 kg/m2. Our goal is to better understand the remaining station specific systematic and random deviations. For example, for all stations, the random deviations are smaller for the high compared to the low resolution model data. We attribute this to smaller representative errors and smaller forward model (interpolation) errors. However, for the systematic deviations the result is not too obvious. Comparisons with measurements from instruments which are collocated with the GNSS stations are envisaged to better understand the issue.