English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Seismic and Aseismic Fault Slip During the Initiation Phase of the 2017MW= 6.9 Valparaíso Earthquake

Authors

Caballero,  Emmanuel
External Organizations;

Chounet,  Agnès
External Organizations;

Duputel,  Zacharie
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/jorge

Jara,  Jorge       
0 Pre-GFZ, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences;

Twardzik,  Cedric
External Organizations;

Jolivet,  Romain
External Organizations;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Caballero, E., Chounet, A., Duputel, Z., Jara, J., Twardzik, C., Jolivet, R. (2021): Seismic and Aseismic Fault Slip During the Initiation Phase of the 2017MW= 6.9 Valparaíso Earthquake. - Geophysical Research Letters, 48, 6, e2020GL091916.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091916


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz.de/pubman/item/item_5037268
Abstract
Transient deformation associated with foreshocks activity has been observed before large earthquakes, suggesting the occurrence of a detectable preseismic slow slip during the initiation phase. A critical issue consists in discriminating the relative contributions from seismic and aseismic fault slip during the preparation phase of large earthquakes. We focus on the April–May 2017 Valparaíso earthquake sequence, which involved a MW = 6.9 earthquake preceded by intense foreshock activity. To assess the relative contribution of seismic and aseismic slip, we compare surface displacement predicted from foreshocks source models with transient motion measured prior to the mainshock. The comparison between observed and predicted displacements shows that only half of the total displacement can be explained by the contribution of foreshocks. This result suggests the presence of aseismic pre-slip during an initiation phase preceding the mainshock.