English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Seismogenic Potential of the Subduction Zone in Northern Chile

Authors

Michel,  Sylvain
External Organizations;

Jolivet,  Romain
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/jorge

Jara,  Jorge       
0 Pre-GFZ, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences;

Rollins,  Chris
External Organizations;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Michel, S., Jolivet, R., Jara, J., Rollins, C. (2023): Seismogenic Potential of the Subduction Zone in Northern Chile. - Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 113, 3, 1013-1024.
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120220142


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz.de/pubman/item/item_5037261
Abstract
The northern Chile region of the Nazca subduction zone ruptured in an earthquake in 1877, which induced a tsunami. The various magnitude estimates of this event are based on the evaluation of historical records, seismic intensities, and/or tide gauge information; however, its actual along‐strike extent is debated. Based on geodetic data, the previous studies have suggested that this region has the potential for an 8.2–8.8 event. We re‐evaluate the seismic potential of the region, accounting for the buildup rate of moment deficit along the megathrust, the earthquake magnitude–frequency distribution, and the physics of earthquakes. We combine an improved probabilistic estimate of moment deficit rate with results from dynamic models of the earthquake cycle, testing, in particular, the influence of a potential aseismic barrier near the city of Iquique, which may influence the extent and magnitude of large events in this region. We find that 8.8 is the most probable maximum magnitude earthquake in the region, and that the potential barrier likely has a limited impact considering uncertainties. We discuss the effect of the moment deficit rate on the fault, the b‐value, and the importance of postseismic processes on our results.