English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Update on the seismogenic potential of the Upper Rhine Graben southern region

Authors

Michel,  Sylvain
External Organizations;

Duverger,  Clara
External Organizations;

Bollinger,  Laurent
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/jorge

Jara,  Jorge       
0 Pre-GFZ, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences;

Jolivet,  Romain
External Organizations;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Michel, S., Duverger, C., Bollinger, L., Jara, J., Jolivet, R. (2024): Update on the seismogenic potential of the Upper Rhine Graben southern region. - Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS), 24, 1, 163-177.
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-163-2024


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz.de/pubman/item/item_5037258
Abstract
The Upper Rhine Graben (URG), located in France and Germany, is bordered by north–south-trending faults, some of which are considered active, posing a potential threat to the dense population and infrastructures on the Alsace plain. The largest historical earthquake in the region was the M6.5±0.5 Basel earthquake in 1356. Current seismicity (M>2.5 since 1960) is mostly diffuse and located within the graben. We build upon previous seismic hazard studies of the URG by exploring uncertainties in greater detail and revisiting a number of assumptions. We first take into account the limited evidence of neotectonic activity and then explore tectonic scenarios that have not been taken into account previously, exploring uncertainties for Mmax, its recurrence time, the b value, and the moment released aseismically or through aftershocks. Uncertainties in faults' moment deficit rates, on the observed seismic events' magnitude–frequency distribution and on the moment–area scaling law of earthquakes, are also explored. Assuming a purely dip-slip normal faulting mechanism associated with a simplified model with three main faults, Mmax maximum probability is estimated at Mw 6.1. Considering this scenario, there would be a 99 % probability that Mmax is less than 7.3. In contrast, with a strike-slip assumption associated with a four-main-fault model, consistent with recent paleoseismological studies and the present-day stress field, Mmax is estimated at Mw 6.8. Based on this scenario, there would be a 99 % probability that Mmax is less than 7.6.