English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Impact of VAEformer Compression Algorithm Precision Loss on the Tropospheric Delays for Microwave Remote Sensing

Authors

Ding,  Junsheng
External Organizations;

Xu,  Cancan
External Organizations;

Chen,  Wu
External Organizations;

Chen,  J.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/jgwang

Wang,  Jungang
1.1 Space Geodetic Techniques, 1.0 Geodesy, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum;

Zhang,  Yize
External Organizations;

Bai,  Lei
External Organizations;

Han,  Tao
External Organizations;

Xiong,  Yuhao
External Organizations;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Ding, J., Xu, C., Chen, W., Chen, J., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Bai, L., Han, T., Xiong, Y. (2025): Impact of VAEformer Compression Algorithm Precision Loss on the Tropospheric Delays for Microwave Remote Sensing. - IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 63, 4107311.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2025.3587944


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz.de/pubman/item/item_5036601
Abstract
Ray-tracing through numerical weather models (NWMs) is one of the most accurate methods for determining slant tropospheric delays (STDs) in microwave remote sensing. However, the massive data volumes of high-resolution NWMs create substantial I/O operations, limiting large-scale ray-tracing on general hardware. This constraint has historically necessitated parameterized tropospheric delay models, which are disseminated as standardized products (e.g., zenith delays with mapping functions and horizontal gradients). Recently, the AI-driven VAE-former algorithm revolutionized NWM compression, achieving >470:1 ratios by compressing 37 pressure level, 0.25°×0.25° ERA5 data into files smaller than surface-only VMF3 products (1°×1° resolution). This breakthrough challenges the conventional reliance on parameterized models as the sole practical solution. We quantified discrepancies in tropospheric delay parameters between original ERA5 and VAEformer-compressed CRA5 data across 2022, evaluating compression fidelity on global grids and against in-situ zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) estimates. Results show global average precision loss from compression is <2 mm (<5%) for ZTD, with RMSE differences <0.2 mm when validated against over 5,000 GNSS stations. These errors are significantly smaller than inter-Analysis Center (AC) variations (4–6 mm) and GNSS-NWM mismatches (>10 mm). Our findings demonstrate CRA5 as a reliable ERA5 substitute, with compression-induced inaccuracies being negligible for most microwave-based remote sensing applications. This work underscores that parameterized delay modeling is no longer the exclusive pathway, enabling efficient local computation of high-precision STDs without through mapping functions and gradients.