English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Global distribution of earthquake-fault dip angles

Authors

Basili,  Roberto
External Organizations;
Geo-INQUIRE related material, External Organizations;

Tiberti,  Mara Monica
External Organizations;
Geo-INQUIRE related material, External Organizations;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Basili, R., Tiberti, M. M. (2025): Global distribution of earthquake-fault dip angles. - Geophysical Journal International, 242, 1, ggaf158.
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaf158


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz.de/pubman/item/item_5035184
Abstract
The dip angle is one of the fault parameters that most affect fault-related hazard analyses (ground shaking, tsunami) because it not only influences the inference of other fault parameters (e.g., down-dip width, earthquake maximum magnitude based on fault scaling relations) but also and most importantly, the dip angle controls: a) the fault-to-site distance values of ground motion estimates based on predictive models (Ground Motion Models); b) the ground shaking predicted by physics-based simulations; and c) the vertical component of static surface displacement, which determines the initial conditions for tsunami simulations when the seafloor is displaced. We present the results of a global survey of earthquake-fault dip angles (G-DIP, short for Global Dip) and analyse their empirical distribution for various faulting categories (normal, reverse, transcurrent crustal faulting, and subduction-interface reverse faulting). These new empirical statistics are derived from an extensive and homogeneous dataset of 597 uniquely determined fault plane dip angles corresponding to 269 individual earthquakes. As such, our statistics of fault dip occurrences separated by fault types at a global scale improve previous fault dip-angle distributions. We found significant differences between the average empirical fault dip-angle distributions and the values usually assumed based on Anderson's theory. Dip-slip crustal faults show the same mode at 40-50° for both normal and reverse mechanisms, whereas transcurrent faults have a large spread of values below the mode at 80-90°. Regarding reverse crustal faults, our result became evident after separating them from subduction interface faults, which show significantly lower dip values, with a mode at 10-20°. We remark on the importance of documented uniquely determined fault planes to develop dip-angle statistics. We also suggest that our results can effectively be used as distribution priors for characterising the geometry of poorly known seismogenic faults in earthquake hazard analyses and earthquake-fault modelling experiments.