English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Conference Paper

The Surface Heat Flow of Mars – and an attempt to measure it in-situ

Authors

Spohn,  Tilman
IUGG 2023, General Assemblies, 1 General, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), External Organizations;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Spohn, T. (2023): The Surface Heat Flow of Mars – and an attempt to measure it in-situ, XXVIII General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) (Berlin 2023).
https://doi.org/10.57757/IUGG23-0713


Cite as: https://gfzpublic.gfz.de/pubman/item/item_5016775
Abstract
NASA's InSight mission [1] has installed the first geophysical observatory on Mars, including a seismometer, a magnetometer, sensors to track the rotation of the planet, an atmosphere science package and a heat flow probe HP3 [2]. Cosmochemical and geophysical models [e.g., 3,4] suggest that the average Martian surface heat flow is around 25mW/m2and may vary across the surface between 17 and 50mW/m2. HP3 was planned to use a small penetrator - nicknamed the “mole” – to install a string of temperature sensors up to a depth between 3m and 5m. A radiometer to measure the surface radiation temperature complemented the package. Sensors on the mole would measure the thermal conductivity as a function of depth. Depending on the final depth reached, temperature was to be measured daily for a period of months up to one Martian year. Unfortunately, the mole failed to penetrate to the required depth because of unexpected soil properties. Instead, it was used as a penetrometer and thermal probe to measure the thermal and mechanical properties of the top 40cm of the Martian soil. Inversion of the seismic recordings of Marsquakes allowed an estimate of the variation of the near surface temperature with depth and of the heat flow [5,6]. These estimates are consistent with the estimates from the earlier models [3,4].

[1] Banerdt et al. 2020 doi:10.1038/s41561-020-0544-y
[2] Spohn et al. (2022) doi: 10.1007/s11214-022-00941-z
[3] Plesa et al. (2016) doi:10.1002/2016JE005126
[4] Smreakr et al (2019) doi.org/10.1007/s11214-018-0563-9
[5] Khan et al. (2021) doi:10.1126/science.abf2966
[6] Drilleau et al. (2022) doi:10.1029/2021JE007067