English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Spatial influence of fault-related stress perturbations in northern Switzerland

Velagala, L. S. A. R., Heidbach, O., Ziegler, M., Reiter, K., Rajabi, M., Henk, A., Giger, S. B., Hergert, T. (2026): Spatial influence of fault-related stress perturbations in northern Switzerland. - Solid Earth, 17, 179-201.
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-17-179-2026

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
5038256.pdf (Publisher version), 13MB
Name:
5038256.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Gold
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Velagala, Lalit Sai Aditya Reddy1, Author           
Heidbach, O.1, Author                 
Ziegler, M.1, Author                 
Reiter, Karsten2, Author
Rajabi, Mojtaba2, Author
Henk, Andreas2, Author
Giger, Silvio B.2, Author
Hergert, Tobias2, Author
Affiliations:
12.6 Seismic Hazard and Risk Dynamics, 2.0 Geophysics, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, ou_146032              
2External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: The spatial influence of faults on the crustal stress field is a topic of ongoing debate. While faults are often known to perturb the stress field at a meter scale, their lateral influence over a few hundred meters to several kilometers remains poorly understood. To address this knowledge gap, we use a 3D geomechanical numerical model based on 3D seismic data from northern Switzerland. The model is calibrated with 45 horizontal stress magnitude data obtained from micro-hydraulic fracturing (MHF) and sleeve re-opening (SR) tests conducted in two boreholes in the Zürich Nordost (ZNO) siting region, northern Switzerland. This model with seven faults implemented as contact surfaces serves as the reference model in our study. The reference model is systematically compared to three fault-agnostic models, which share identical rock properties, model dimensions, and calibration data with the reference model, but differ in their element resolution and mechanical properties' assignment procedure. Results show that at distances <1 km from faults, differences in maximum horizontal stress orientation between models range from 3–6°, and horizontal stress magnitude differences are approximately 1–2 MPa. Beyond 1 km, these differences reduce to <1.5° and <0.5 MPa, respectively. These differences are significantly smaller than the calibration data uncertainties at ZNO, which average to ±0.7 MPa and ±3.5 MPa for the minimum horizontal and maximum horizontal stress magnitude, respectively, and ±11° for the maximum horizontal stress orientation. An important implication of our results is that, under the specific geological, mechanical, and stress conditions observed at the ZNO siting region, explicit representation of faults may not be necessary in geomechanical models predicting the stress state of rock volumes located 1 km or more from active faults. This simplification substantially reduced our model setup time from 2 months to 2 days, without compromising the reliability of stress field predictions.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2026-01-302026
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.5194/se-17-179-2026
GFZPOF: p4 T8 Georesources
OATYPE: Gold Open Access
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Solid Earth
Source Genre: Journal, SCI, Scopus, oa
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 17 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 179 - 201 Identifier: Publisher: Copernicus
Publisher: European Geosciences Union (EGU)
CoNE: https://gfzpublic.gfz.de/cone/journals/resource/journals454