English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Update on the seismogenic potential of the Upper Rhine Graben southern region

Michel, S., Duverger, C., Bollinger, L., Jara, J., Jolivet, R. (2024): Update on the seismogenic potential of the Upper Rhine Graben southern region. - Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS), 24, 1, 163-177.
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-163-2024

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Michel, Sylvain1, Author
Duverger, Clara1, Author
Bollinger, Laurent1, Author
Jara, Jorge2, Author                 
Jolivet, Romain1, Author
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              
20 Pre-GFZ, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, ou_146023              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: The Upper Rhine Graben (URG), located in France and Germany, is bordered by north–south-trending faults, some of which are considered active, posing a potential threat to the dense population and infrastructures on the Alsace plain. The largest historical earthquake in the region was the M6.5±0.5 Basel earthquake in 1356. Current seismicity (M>2.5 since 1960) is mostly diffuse and located within the graben. We build upon previous seismic hazard studies of the URG by exploring uncertainties in greater detail and revisiting a number of assumptions. We first take into account the limited evidence of neotectonic activity and then explore tectonic scenarios that have not been taken into account previously, exploring uncertainties for Mmax, its recurrence time, the b value, and the moment released aseismically or through aftershocks. Uncertainties in faults' moment deficit rates, on the observed seismic events' magnitude–frequency distribution and on the moment–area scaling law of earthquakes, are also explored. Assuming a purely dip-slip normal faulting mechanism associated with a simplified model with three main faults, Mmax maximum probability is estimated at Mw 6.1. Considering this scenario, there would be a 99 % probability that Mmax is less than 7.3. In contrast, with a strike-slip assumption associated with a four-main-fault model, consistent with recent paleoseismological studies and the present-day stress field, Mmax is estimated at Mw 6.8. Based on this scenario, there would be a 99 % probability that Mmax is less than 7.6.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2024-01-232024
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.5194/nhess-24-163-2024
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS)
Source Genre: Journal, SCI, Scopus, oa
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 24 (1) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 163 - 177 Identifier: Publisher: Copernicus
Publisher: European Geosciences Union (EGU)
CoNE: https://gfzpublic.gfz.de/cone/journals/resource/journals352