English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  How well can we predict earthquake site response so far? Site-specific approaches

Zhu, C., Cotton, F., Kawase, H., Haendel, A., Pilz, M., Nakano, K. (2022): How well can we predict earthquake site response so far? Site-specific approaches. - Earthquake Spectra, 38, 2, 1047-1057.
https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930211060859

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
5009264.pdf (Publisher version), 3MB
Name:
5009264.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Zhu, Chuanbin1, Author                 
Cotton, Fabrice1, Author           
Kawase, Hiroshi2, Author
Haendel, Annabel1, Author                 
Pilz, M.1, Author                 
Nakano, Kenichi2, Author
Affiliations:
12.6 Seismic Hazard and Risk Dynamics, 2.0 Geophysics, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum, ou_146032              
2External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: OPEN ACCESS. Site response, site effects, HVSR, ground response analysis, square-root-impedance, earthquake
 Abstract: Earthquake site responses or site effects are the modifications of surface geology to seismic waves. How well can we predict the site effects (average over many earthquakes) at individual sites so far? To address this question, we tested and compared the effectiveness of different estimation techniques in predicting the outcrop Fourier site responses separated using the general inversion technique (GIT) from recordings. Techniques being evaluated are (a) the empirical correction to the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio of earthquakes (c-HVSR), (b) one-dimensional ground response analysis (GRA), and (c) the square-root-impedance (SRI) method (also called the quarter-wavelength approach). Our results show that c-HVSR can capture significantly more site-specific features in site responses than both GRA and SRI in the aggregate, especially at relatively high frequencies. c-HVSR achieves a “good match” in spectral shape at ∼80%–90% of 145 testing sites, whereas GRA and SRI fail at most sites. GRA and SRI results have a high level of parametric and/or modeling errors which can be constrained, to some extent, by collecting on-site recordings.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2022-01-142022
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: 29
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1177/87552930211060859
GFZPOF: p4 T3 Restless Earth
OATYPE: Hybrid Open Access
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Earthquake Spectra
Source Genre: Journal, SCI, Scopus
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 38 (2) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 1047 - 1057 Identifier: CoNE: https://gfzpublic.gfz.de/cone/journals/resource/140103
Publisher: Sage Publications
Publisher: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute