English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Detecting Site Resonant Frequency Using HVSR: Fourier versus Response Spectrum and the First versus the Highest Peak Frequency

Zhu, C., Cotton, F., Pilz, M. (2020): Detecting Site Resonant Frequency Using HVSR: Fourier versus Response Spectrum and the First versus the Highest Peak Frequency. - Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 110, 2, 427-440.
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120190186

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
5001062.pdf (Postprint), 2MB
Name:
5001062.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Zhu, Chuanbin1, Author                 
Cotton, Fabrice1, Author           
Pilz, M.1, Author                 
Affiliations:
12.6 Seismic Hazard and Risk Dynamics, 2.0 Geophysics, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum, ou_146032              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: In this investigation, we examine the uncertainties using the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) technique on earthquake recordings to detect site resonant frequencies at 207 KiK-net sites. Our results show that the scenario dependence of response (pseudospectral acceleration) spectral ratio could bias the estimates of resonant frequencies for sites having multiple significant peaks with comparable amplitudes. Thus, the Fourier amplitude spectrum (FAS) should be preferred in computing HVSR. For more than 80% of the investigated sites, the first peak (in the frequency domain) on the average HVSR curve over multiple sites coincides with the highest peak. However, for sites with multiple peaks, the highest peak frequency (fp) is less susceptible to the selection criteria of significant peaks and the extent of smoothing to spectrum than the first peak frequency (f0). Meanwhile, in comparison to the surface-to-borehole spectral ratio, f0 tends to underestimate the predominant frequency (at which the largest amplification occurs) more than fp. In addition, in terms of characterizing linear site response, fp shows a better overall performance than f0. Based on these findings, we thus recommend that seismic network operators provide fp on the average HVSRFAS curve as a priority, ideally together with the average HVSRFAS curve in site characterization.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2020-03-032020
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: GFZPOF: p3 PT4 Natural Hazards
DOI: 10.1785/0120190186
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Source Genre: Journal, SCI, Scopus
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 110 (2) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 427 - 440 Identifier: CoNE: https://gfzpublic.gfz.de/cone/journals/resource/journals59
Publisher: Seismological Society of America (SSA)