English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  A precise and accurate "astronomical" age of the Ries impact crater, Germany: A cautious note on argon dating of impact material

Rocholl, A., Ovtcharova, M., Schaltegger, U., Wijbrans, J., Pohl, J., Harzhauser, M., Prieto, J., Ulbig, A., Boehme, M. (2011): A precise and accurate "astronomical" age of the Ries impact crater, Germany: A cautious note on argon dating of impact material, (Geophysical Research Abstracts ; Vol. 13, EGU2011-13322-7, 2011), European Geosciences Union General Assembly (Vienna, Austria 2011).

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show
hide
Description:
-
OA-Status:

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Rocholl, A.1, Author                 
Ovtcharova, M.2, Author
Schaltegger, U.2, Author
Wijbrans, J.2, Author
Pohl, J.2, Author
Harzhauser, M.2, Author
Prieto, J.2, Author
Ulbig, A.2, Author
Boehme, M.2, Author
Affiliations:
10 Pre-GFZ, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum, ou_146023              
2External Organizations (TEMPORARY!), ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Accurate and precise dating of meteorite impacts is a prime intent of stratigraphic, paleoclimatic, and paleonto-logical research. Robust age estimates, however, exist only for 11 of 174 confirmed impacts structures (ref. 1) including the Ries crater in Germany, one of the best studied impact structures on Earth. This is probably also the impact site with the highest number of radiometric age determinations. So far, published ages are exclusively based on the analysis of impact-generated melts, i.e. suevite glass and/or moldavites (tektites) (e.g., ref. 2-7) and feldspar melt (ref. 8). However, despite more than 60 individual isotopic age data obtained during 50 years of research there is no consensus as to the accurate age of the impact. For example, 40Ar-39Ar ages range from 15.2 Ma (ref. 2) to 14.3 Ma (ref. 6,7), with the young ages representing most of the recent age determinations. Accordingly, the long-standing estimate of about 15 +- 0.2 Ma (ref. 2,3) has been criticized recently as being too old by more than 0.5 Ma (e.g., ref. 1, 5-8) and only confirmed once (ref. 9). Ages < 14.6 Ma, however, pose severe problems on geophysical and biostratigraphic interpretations. Most significantly and central to the discussion, they are in conflict with a reversed magnetic field during impact (ref. 10,11), because a normal magnetic field persisted from about 14.6 to 14.15 Ma (ref. 12), i.e. impact ages < 14.6 Ma are impossible from a paleomagnetic point of view.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2011
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: GFZPOF: p3 PT1 Global Processes
 Degree: -

Event

show
hide
Title: European Geosciences Union General Assembly
Place of Event: Vienna, Austria
Start-/End Date: 2011-04-03 - 2011-04-08

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Geophysical Research Abstracts
Source Genre: Series
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: Vol. 13, EGU2011-13322-7, 2011 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: -