English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Sunda Subduction Zone: What causes differences in the 2004 and 2005 Sumatra earthquakes ruptures?

Shulgin, A., Kopp, H., Klaeschen, D., Papenberg, C., Tilmann, F., Flueh, E., Franke, D., Barckhausen, U., Krabbenhoeft, A. (2012): Sunda Subduction Zone: What causes differences in the 2004 and 2005 Sumatra earthquakes ruptures?, (Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 14, EGU2012-12506, 2012), General Assembly European Geosciences Union (Vienna, Austria 2012).

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Shulgin, A.1, Author
Kopp, H.1, Author
Klaeschen, D.1, Author
Papenberg, C.1, Author
Tilmann, Frederik2, Author                 
Flueh, E.R.1, Author
Franke, D.1, Author
Barckhausen, U.1, Author
Krabbenhoeft, A.1, Author
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              
22.4 Seismology, 2.0 Physics of the Earth, Departments, GFZ Publication Database, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum, ou_30023              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 DDC: 550 - Earth sciences
 Abstract: The Sunda subduction zone has been intensively studied over the last several years, following the Great Sumatra Mw 9.1 earthquake of 2004. Later earthquakes of 2005 and 2010 ruptured in the vicinity of the southern termination of the 2004 rupture, confirming the known observation, that the subduction zone earthquakes usually form segmented patches of co-seismic rupture, bounded by permanent barriers. In particular, in the case of the Sumatra 2004 and 2005 earthquakes, the segment boundary is attributed to the subduction of the 96_E fracture zone. A set of collocated reflection and wide-angle seismic profiles are available on both sides of the segment boundary, perpendicular to the trench, located offshore Simeulue Island. In this study we compare the seismic structure of the subduction complex along two profiles, located on the different sides of the segment boundary: one in the area of the 2004 rupture; the other in the rupture area of the 2005 and 2010 earthquakes. The key differences include: (a) change in the oceanic plate crustal thickness, (b) variations in the amount of sediment on the oceanic plate and in the trench, (c) the volume of the accretionary complex. By comparing the crustal structure along the profiles, we speculate that the 96_E fracture zone presents an efficient barrier in the trench parallel sediment transport, and acts as a divider between the oceanic crustal blocks of different structure. We further speculate that the observed variability of the seismogenic behavior (the width of the seismogenic zone) and the tsunami potential of adjacent segments are mostly controlled by the amount of sediments entering the subduction system.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2012
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: eDoc: 20619
GFZPOF: PT1 Planet Earth: Global Processes and Change
GFZPOF: PT2 Earth System Dynamics: Coupled Processes and Regional Impact
 Degree: -

Event

show
hide
Title: General Assembly European Geosciences Union (Vienna, Austria 2012)
Place of Event: -
Start-/End Date: -

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 14, EGU2012-12506, 2012
Source Genre: Series
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: -